Research Paper: Shaming in Specialized Drug Courts

This is a research musical composition on shaming in narrow medicate judicatorys. This domain entered that the recidivism is higher(prenominal) for the narrow down medicate tourist coquet of justice and consequently for the perpetual processing. This strike reveals that the drug courtroom is more(prenominal) stigmatizing thus the modal(a) court; in summation it is not reintegrative enough.\n\n\nMiethe et al. (2000) seek the reintegrating shaming theory; development it as a framework they battleground the issuanceiveness of specialized drug courts in reducing recidivism risks. This study showed that the recidivism is higher for the specialized drug court then for the regular processing. This study reveals that the drug court is more stigmatizing then the ordinary court; in addition it is not reintegrative enough.\n\nThe expectation of a positive effect of drug court was anticipated belongings in take heed the reintegrative role of the settle and the family in constitute of counseling and therapy. The samples were taken in Clark County Las Vegas Nevada. The sample size was of 301 defendants who were spy in the court for 3 months. The results showed that recidivism was 10% higher than radiation diagram for those going through special drug courts then for others. Recidivism was in any case higher for drug charges and non-drug charges.\n\nThe surprising results show that the process and the construction of the drug court is much distinguishable from the theoretical framework, and they ar more stigmatizing then reintegrating.\n\nKindly align custom do Essays, Term Papers, interrogation Papers, Thesis, Dissertation, Assignment, Book Reports, Reviews, Presentations, Projects, moorage Studies, Coursework, Homework, Creative Writing, hypercritical Thinking, on the consequence by clicking on the order page.