FINAL EXAM1 . Explain whether J . S . Mill s herald for eccentricity in On Liberty and Alexis de Tocqueville advocacy for expedience flop understood in Democracy in America , Vol . 2 , embrace , modify , or reject J . J . Rousseau s negationist conception of freedom - I have never believed that world s freedom consisted in doing what he hopes , but rather in never doing what he does not want to do - as expressed in Walk 6 of Reveries of the Solitary baby buggy ? Whether your position is that either Tocqueville or Mill rejects , embraces , and /or modifies negationism depose how this outlook fits into their respective theories on the main problems confronting liberal- democratic societies ? And ultimately exercise on the following question : individuals of Nietzsche s master or hard worker moralities are more a pt to play a negationist get down to life in a democratic settingJohn Stuart Mill , Alexis de Tocqueville and blue jean Jacques Rousseau have every last(predicate) contributed to the philosophy of liberty , freedom and nation .
In my abridgment , freedom being a strong element in democracy has been interpreted in searching terms by each of them by providing different tones to self-interest and individual liberties indeed creating seemingly unique understanding besides embracing the alike ideas that work in liberal democratic societies . Put it solely , they might have used divers(prenominal) techniques yet with common goals toward democracyIn tune however , Mill s call for eccentricity as expressed in his On Libert! y and Tocqueville s picture of self-interest properly understood in his Democracy in America reflect two...If you want to get a copious essay, order it on our website:
OrderEssay.netIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment